AI Automation/Professional Services

Automate Your Reference Checks with a Custom Voice AI

Yes, a small business should use a voice AI consultant to build a custom reference checking system. This approach automates manual recruiter calls, replacing them with a consistent, efficient process for each candidate.

By Parker Gawne, Founder at Syntora|Updated Mar 5, 2026

Syntora offers expertise in building custom voice AI reference checking systems. Such systems leverage modern AI and cloud architectures to automate recruiter workflows, significantly reducing manual effort while ensuring consistent data collection.

The scope of such a project depends on your existing systems and specific requirements. Integrating with an Applicant Tracking System (ATS) like Greenhouse via its API is a common starting point. Implementing advanced features such as custom sentiment analysis or specific keyword flagging requires access to historical reference check notes to fine-tune the AI's prompts and models. Syntora would collaborate closely to define these requirements and design an architecture tailored to your needs.

The Problem

What Problem Does This Solve?

Recruiting teams often try using generic calling services. A tool like Twilio Studio can place calls, but it cannot interpret the unstructured audio responses or summarize the results into a candidate profile. You get a raw MP3 file, which a recruiter still has to listen to, defeating the purpose of automation.

A common scenario involves a 15-person firm trying to scale from 20 to 50 hires a year. Their two recruiters are a bottleneck. Reference checks for 5 finalists take 10-15 hours of phone tag and note-taking. They look at enterprise recruiting platforms like HireVue, but the $20,000 annual contract and per-seat licensing model are designed for 500-person companies, not them.

These off-the-shelf tools fail because the core problem is not placing the call; it is understanding the answer. They force a choice between a raw audio file that creates more manual work or an expensive, inflexible AI module that cannot be customized to ask role-specific questions. They provide a partial solution that does not address the actual bottleneck: recruiter time spent on low-value, repetitive conversations.

Our Approach

How Would Syntora Approach This?

Syntora's approach to building a custom voice AI reference checking system would begin by mapping your existing reference questions into a structured script. We would leverage the Claude API to generate dynamic, natural-sounding follow-up questions based on the reference's initial answers. This ensures a more adaptive conversation than simple static scripts. We have experience building similar document processing pipelines using Claude API for financial documents, and the same pattern applies effectively to extracting insights from voice interactions.

The system would integrate with your existing ATS (e.g., Lever, Greenhouse) using Python and the httpx library to pull candidate and reference contact information automatically. The core calling logic would be built on AWS Lambda, utilizing Twilio's API for programmable voice. When a candidate reaches the reference check stage in your ATS, a webhook would trigger the Lambda function. This function would initiate an outbound call, ask the scripted questions, and record the reference's responses. The audio file, typically 2-4 minutes long, would be saved directly to a secure Amazon S3 bucket within your AWS account.

A second AWS Lambda function would be configured to trigger the moment the audio file is saved. It would use an audio-to-text model to produce a full transcript, a process that typically takes about 15 seconds for a 3-minute call. That transcript would then be sent to the Claude API with a carefully engineered prompt sequence. This prompt would instruct the AI to generate a concise summary, score responses against key competencies, and extract any predefined keywords relevant to your hiring criteria.

The entire analysis pipeline would be designed for efficient execution. The final summary, competency scores, and full transcript would then be posted back to the candidate's record in your ATS via an API call. We would implement robust logging using structlog, and design automated alerts (e.g., to a Slack channel) for failed calls or low-confidence transcriptions (below 90%). The architecture would be designed for scalability, supporting concurrent calls as needed, with typical AWS hosting costs for such a system estimated to be under $50 monthly, depending on volume.

Why It Matters

Key Benefits

01

Get Summaries in 60 Seconds, Not Hours

The entire process from call completion to a summarized report in your ATS takes less than one minute. Recruiters review insights, not listen to recordings.

02

Pay For The Build, Not Per Recruiter

A one-time project cost with minimal monthly hosting. This avoids the high per-seat fees of enterprise recruiting platforms that charge based on headcount.

03

You Own the Code and the Prompts

You receive the full Python source code and the exact Claude API prompts Syntora has developed. There is no vendor lock-in; your asset is portable and resides in your GitHub.

04

Failure Alerts Sent Directly to Slack

We configure webhooks to send real-time alerts if a call fails or transcription quality is low. You know instantly if something needs manual attention.

05

Writes Directly to Greenhouse or Lever

The system uses your ATS's API to read candidate data and write back summaries. It becomes a native part of your existing recruiting workflow, no new software to learn.

How We Deliver

The Process

01

Script and ATS Access (Week 1)

You provide your standard reference questions and create an API key for your ATS. We draft the initial call script and map the necessary data fields for integration.

02

Core System Build (Week 2)

We build the calling and transcription pipeline on AWS Lambda. You receive access to a staging environment to test calls with your team's phone numbers.

03

Integration and Testing (Week 3)

We connect the pipeline to your live ATS and test the full workflow. You receive a draft of the system runbook for review and feedback.

04

Launch and Monitoring (Week 4+)

The system goes live. We monitor performance for 30 days to handle edge cases. You receive the final source code, documentation, and full ownership.

The Syntora Advantage

Not all AI partners are built the same.

AI Audit First

Other Agencies

Assessment phase is often skipped or abbreviated

Syntora

Syntora

We assess your business before we build anything

Private AI

Other Agencies

Typically built on shared, third-party platforms

Syntora

Syntora

Fully private systems. Your data never leaves your environment

Your Tools

Other Agencies

May require new software purchases or migrations

Syntora

Syntora

Zero disruption to your existing tools and workflows

Team Training

Other Agencies

Training and ongoing support are usually extra

Syntora

Syntora

Full training included. Your team hits the ground running from day one

Ownership

Other Agencies

Code and data often stay on the vendor's platform

Syntora

Syntora

You own everything we build. The systems, the data, all of it. No lock-in

Get Started

Ready to Automate Your Professional Services Operations?

Book a call to discuss how we can implement ai automation for your professional services business.

FAQ

Everything You're Thinking. Answered.

01

How is the project cost determined?

02

What happens if a reference's voicemail picks up?

03

How is this better than using a virtual assistant (VA) service?

04

How is the reference's data and privacy handled?

05

Can the AI ask different questions for different roles?

06

Does it sound like a robot?