Build a Voice AI Screener That Actually Understands Candidates
The best voice AI platforms for screening applicants are custom-built systems using models like Whisper and Claude. They outperform off-the-shelf tools by analyzing conversational nuance, not just keywords.
Syntora offers custom-built voice AI solutions for screening job applicants, utilizing models like Whisper and Claude to analyze conversational nuance. These systems integrate with existing ATS platforms and are designed as serverless architectures for efficient, scalable operation.
A typical system involves provisioning a dedicated phone number for applicants, a transcription service, and a large language model that scores the conversation against a custom rubric. The architectural complexity and development timeline depend on factors like the number of roles you're hiring for, the depth of analysis required, and integration needs with existing Applicant Tracking Systems.
Syntora designs and implements these tailored voice AI solutions. We've built document processing pipelines using Claude API for financial documents, and the underlying pattern for extracting and scoring information from unstructured text applies directly to voice screening in the recruitment industry. An engagement with Syntora would involve defining your specific screening criteria and integrating a custom AI solution into your existing workflow.
The Problem
What Problem Does This Solve?
Most HR teams first look at tools like MyInterview or HireVue. These platforms work for structured video interviews, but their voice analysis is often keyword-based. They can flag a candidate who says "teamwork" but cannot distinguish between someone who gives a genuine example and someone who just drops the buzzword. They also lock you into rigid question paths and expensive per-seat contracts.
Some teams try to build a simpler version with traditional Interactive Voice Response (IVR) systems. This approach fails because IVRs are just phone trees. They can ask "Press 1 for yes, 2 for no" to confirm a certification, but they cannot handle open-ended questions like, "Tell me about a time you solved a problem on the fly." This misses any chance to assess critical soft skills.
A regional logistics company hiring 50 warehouse staff per quarter faced this exact issue. Their two-person HR team was overwhelmed. The off-the-shelf tools filtered out good candidates who didn't use specific keywords, and the IVR system couldn't tell them anything about a candidate's personality or problem-solving skills, leading to many wasted second-round interviews.
Our Approach
How Would Syntora Approach This?
An engagement with Syntora would begin with a discovery phase to understand your specific hiring workflows, job requirements, and desired integration points with your Applicant Tracking System. This informs the custom scoring rubric and prompt engineering for the AI.
The technical approach typically starts by provisioning a dedicated phone number using Twilio. When a candidate calls, the audio would be streamed to an AWS S3 bucket. An AWS Lambda function would then trigger on the file upload and transcribe the conversation efficiently using OpenAI's Whisper API, providing a clean, time-stamped text transcript.
This transcript would then be processed by the Claude 3 Sonnet API. Syntora designs a multi-shot prompt that incorporates the specific job description, your custom scoring rubric with defined key traits (e.g., communication clarity, problem-solving skills), and examples of strong and weak answers. Claude then scores each trait and provides a written justification, referencing specific parts of the conversation.
The output is a structured JSON object containing scores, justifications, and the full transcript. Syntora would integrate this data directly into your existing ATS, such as Greenhouse or Lever, using their native APIs. The aim is for recruiters to access a summary score and transcript notes on the candidate's profile shortly after the call concludes.
The system architecture would be serverless, built with Python on AWS Lambda and connected via Amazon SQS queues, eliminating the need for server management. For systems processing up to 500 candidates monthly, projected AWS compute costs are typically low. A typical engagement for a system of this complexity, from initial discovery to deployment of a working prototype, usually spans 4-6 weeks, with ongoing iteration and support available.
Why It Matters
Key Benefits
Screen 400 Applicants in an Afternoon
The system processes calls in parallel. A batch of hundreds of candidates can be screened in hours, not weeks. The first summary arrives in your ATS 2 minutes after a call ends.
Pay for Usage, Not for Seats
A single fixed-price build, then you only pay for what you use. Monthly hosting on AWS is often under $50, a fraction of a single license for many recruiting platforms.
You Own the Screening Rubric and Code
We deliver the full Python source code to your GitHub repo. You have complete control to modify the scoring logic as your hiring needs change. No vendor lock-in.
Get Alerts for High-Potential Candidates
We configure Slack or email alerts to trigger instantly for any candidate scoring above a set threshold. Your team can follow up in minutes, not days.
Integrates Directly Into Your ATS
Results are pushed into Greenhouse, Lever, or your current CRM. Recruiters see scores and transcripts inside the tool they already use every day.
How We Deliver
The Process
Discovery and Rubric Design (Week 1)
You provide the job description and we work together to define 5-7 key traits for the screening rubric. You receive a draft rubric for approval.
Core System Build (Week 2)
We build the Twilio-Lambda-Claude pipeline and test it with sample audio. You receive access to a staging environment to review test outputs.
ATS Integration and Launch (Week 3)
We connect the system to your ATS API and run end-to-end tests with live phone calls. You receive the full source code and system documentation.
Monitoring and Handoff (Weeks 4-8)
We monitor the first 100 live candidates, fine-tuning the prompts based on your feedback. After 8 weeks, you receive a runbook for ongoing maintenance.
Keep Exploring
Related Solutions
The Syntora Advantage
Not all AI partners are built the same.
Other Agencies
Assessment phase is often skipped or abbreviated
Syntora
We assess your business before we build anything
Other Agencies
Typically built on shared, third-party platforms
Syntora
Fully private systems. Your data never leaves your environment
Other Agencies
May require new software purchases or migrations
Syntora
Zero disruption to your existing tools and workflows
Other Agencies
Training and ongoing support are usually extra
Syntora
Full training included. Your team hits the ground running from day one
Other Agencies
Code and data often stay on the vendor's platform
Syntora
You own everything we build. The systems, the data, all of it. No lock-in
Get Started
Ready to Automate Your Professional Services Operations?
Book a call to discuss how we can implement ai automation for your professional services business.
FAQ
