Build an AI System to Stop Expense Fraud
AI reduces expense fraud by analyzing spending patterns against historical data to flag anomalies. This system identifies duplicate receipts, out-of-policy spending, and unusual vendor payments automatically.
Key Takeaways
- AI reduces expense fraud by analyzing spending patterns against historical data to automatically flag anomalies.
- The system cross-references receipts against bank transactions to catch duplicates and out-of-policy spending.
- A custom model can connect to your specific accounting software, unlike generic expense management tools.
- Syntora’s past financial systems sync bank data via Plaid in under 3 seconds, forming the foundation for this work.
Syntora built a financial automation system for its own operations that reduces manual accounting tasks. The system connects Plaid and Stripe to a custom PostgreSQL ledger, processing bank transaction syncs in under 3 seconds. For SMBs, Syntora applies this same engineering to build custom expense management systems that detect fraud by analyzing transaction patterns against company policy.
Syntora built the financial ledger for its own operations, connecting Plaid and Stripe to a PostgreSQL database for real-time transaction categorization. Extending this to expense fraud involves adding receipt parsing with an OCR model and training a classification model on your specific expense policy rules. The complexity depends on how many employees submit expenses and the number of categories in your policy.
The Problem
Why Do Finance Teams Still Manually Verify Every Expense Report?
Most SMBs start with tools like Expensify. Its 'SmartScan' OCR captures receipt totals but fails on context. The system can read a $200 dinner receipt but cannot determine if the dinner was with a client or a spouse. A finance manager must still manually check the memo, cross-reference calendar invites, and guess if the expense is compliant. The automation just moves the manual work from data entry to data verification.
Card-based platforms like Ramp or Brex enforce hard spending limits, which works for predictable costs like software subscriptions. These platforms fail with dynamic, project-based expenses. If a project manager needs to buy $2,500 in materials from a new vendor to meet a deadline, the card gets declined. The approval workflow is rigid and requires manual overrides that defeat the purpose of the platform.
Consider a 30-person consulting firm. An account director takes a client to a sporting event, a valid expense. The ticket costs $400, but the company policy limit is $250 for client entertainment. Expensify flags the amount but cannot see the attached PDF contract that pre-approved the specific expense. The finance manager wastes 15 minutes emailing the account director to confirm the exception, delaying reimbursement and wasting time on a legitimate expense.
The structural problem is that off-the-shelf tools rely on a fixed set of universal rules. They check if an expense is over a dollar limit or submitted after 30 days. They cannot learn a company’s unique spending DNA. These tools don't know that travel to a specific client’s city always involves higher-than-average hotel costs, or that the engineering team’s software purchases spike in Q4. You are forced to fit your business logic into their software’s constraints.
Our Approach
How a Custom AI Model Detects Out-of-Policy Spending
Syntora's approach begins with auditing your last 12 months of expense reports and your written expense policy. We map every category, approval flow, and known exception. This audit identifies the top 3-5 categories where out-of-policy spending is most likely to occur, which becomes the initial focus for the AI model.
We would build a FastAPI service hosted on AWS Lambda that connects to your bank data via Plaid, just as we did for our own financial ledger that syncs in under 3 seconds. For receipt submissions, we would add an endpoint that uses an OCR model to extract text from images. A small AI model, fine-tuned using the Claude API on your specific policy rules, then classifies each expense against your ruleset, flagging anomalies with a 95% or higher confidence score for manual review.
The delivered system provides a simple dashboard showing all submitted expenses with their risk score from 0-100. Approved expenses are batched for payment, and journal entries are automatically created in your PostgreSQL ledger. The entire process for a batch of 50 expenses would take under 60 seconds. The hosting cost on AWS Lambda for a team of 30 is typically under $50/month.
| Manual Expense Review | Syntora's Automated System |
|---|---|
| 3-5 hours per week for 10 employees | Under 5 minutes per day |
| Up to 8% of expenses non-compliant | Flags over 95% of non-compliant expenses for review |
| Data siloed in expense software or spreadsheets | Direct access to structured data in a PostgreSQL database |
Why It Matters
Key Benefits
One Engineer, No Handoffs
The person on your discovery call is the engineer who writes every line of Python. No project managers or miscommunication.
You Own the System
You get the full source code in your GitHub, deployed to your AWS account. No vendor lock-in, ever.
Realistic 4-Week Timeline
From discovery to a deployed system in four weeks, assuming access to bank data and expense history is provided promptly.
Defined Post-Launch Support
Optional monthly maintenance covers model monitoring, API updates for Plaid, and bug fixes for a flat fee. No surprise bills.
Grounded in Financial Engineering
Syntora has built and maintained its own production PostgreSQL ledger, not just experimented with AI tools.
How We Deliver
The Process
Discovery Call
A 30-minute call to review your current expense process, tools, and policy. You receive a scope document outlining the build, timeline, and fixed price.
Architecture & Data Access
You approve the system design, which outlines how the tool will connect to your bank accounts and accounting software. You grant read-only data access for the build.
Iterative Build with Weekly Demos
You see a working prototype in the first two weeks. Your feedback on the fraud detection logic is incorporated before the final version is deployed.
Handoff & Documentation
You receive the complete source code, a deployment runbook, and a video walkthrough. Syntora monitors the system for 30 days post-launch to ensure accuracy.
Keep Exploring
Related Solutions
The Syntora Advantage
Not all AI partners are built the same.
Other Agencies
Assessment phase is often skipped or abbreviated
Syntora
We assess your business before we build anything
Other Agencies
Typically built on shared, third-party platforms
Syntora
Fully private systems. Your data never leaves your environment
Other Agencies
May require new software purchases or migrations
Syntora
Zero disruption to your existing tools and workflows
Other Agencies
Training and ongoing support are usually extra
Syntora
Full training included. Your team hits the ground running from day one
Other Agencies
Code and data often stay on the vendor's platform
Syntora
You own everything we build. The systems, the data, all of it. No lock-in
Get Started
Ready to Automate Your Financial Advising Operations?
Book a call to discuss how we can implement ai automation for your financial advising business.
FAQ
